Report on The Third International Paderborn Computer Othello Tournament October 7.-8., 1995 edited by Michael Buro (mic@research.nj.nec.com) Unlike the first two Paderborn tournaments, PB III was an ordinary IOS (telnet faust.uni-paderborn.de|131.234.28.29 5000) computer tournament with no entry fee and no nice cups for the winners. Furthermore, no program had to be sent to Paderborn - all participants could use their own hardware. Participants, tournament mode & results: ======================================== Participants of one of the strongest computer Othello tournaments ever held were: No. Program IOS-id Architecture Author(s) [Rating]* [x 486/33]** [Nationality] ------------------------------------------------------------ 1. BRUTUS Brutus 486/100 Louis Geoffroy [2303] [3] [CAN] & Martin Piotte 2. BUGS Bugs SPARC-10/M51 Jean-Christophe Weill [2402] [6] [FRA] 3. ECLIPSE eclipse RS-6000 Michael Giles [2565] [6] [USA] & Colin Springer 4. FLIPPER csimmons SPARC-20 Chuck Simmons [-] [6] [USA] 5. KEYANO keyano 8xSGI-MIPS/150 Mark Brockington [2300] [56] [CAN] 6. KITTY kitty SGI-MIPS/150 Igor Durdanovic [2410] [7] [GER] 7. LOGISTELLO logtest SPARC-10/M51 Michael Buro [2795] [6] [GER] 8. MROTH MrOth RS-6000 Fussen Alvaro [1852] [6] [CH] 9. REVFW frenkel 486/50 Alexander Frenkel [-] [3/2] [GER] & Frank Weinreis 10. WIGALD Wigald DEC-Alpha/300 Ralf Brunner [2371] [7]*** [CH] 11. YINGYANG yingyang 486/66 Vince A. Sempronio [2148] [2] [USA] *) At tournament beginning. **) These are only rough estimates of the speed-factor relative to a 486/33. ***) During the tournament a second job was running on WIGALD's machine. So the speed-factor is only 7 instead of 14. Traditionally, in the first part of the Paderborn computer Othello tournaments a single-round-robin (s-r-r) tournament is played. The starting numbers were chosen randomly by program "robin" which also calculated pairings and statistics (the source file robin.c lies in ftp.uni-paderborn.de/unix/othello/src). Each player had 25 minutes thinking time per game without increment and 2 minutes more in case of time-default. Winners got empty squares. The ranking after the s-r-r part was as follows: rank Program IOS-rating pts/games pointavg diff diffavg -------------------------------------------------------- 1 LOGISTELLO 2795 10.0/10 1.00 +174 +17.40 Group 1 2 KEYANO 2300 7.0/10 0.70 +96 +9.60 = BUGS 2402 7.0/10 0.70 +88 +8.80 = BRUTUS 2303 7.0/10 0.70 +72 +7.20 5 KITTY 2410 5.0/10 0.50 +40 +4.00 Group 2 = WIGALD 2371 5.0/10 0.50 +34 +3.40 7 FLIPPER - 4.5/10 0.45 +48 +4.80 8 YINGYANG 2148 3.5/10 0.35 -18 -1.80 9 ECLIPSE 2565 3.0/10 0.30 +44 +4.40 Group 3 = MROTH 1852 3.0/10 0.30 -280 -28.00 11 REVFW - 0.0/10 0.00 -298 -29.80 Thereafter, three groups were formed and the group-local return-games were played in order to obtain the final ranking within the groups by considering all games played in the tournament. Unfortunately, both FLIPPER and YINGYANG did not show up for the final. So in group 2 only KITTY and WIGALD played their return-game. The final ranking was: rank Program IOS-rating pts/games pointavg diff diffavg ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 LOGISTELLO 2795->2826 13.0/13 1.00 +220 +16.92 Group 1 2 BUGS 2402->2456 9.0/13 0.69 +94 +7.23 3 KEYANO 2300->2355 8.0/13 0.62 +84 +6.46 4 BRUTUS 2303->2327 7.0/13 0.54 +32 +2.46 5 WIGALD 2371->2400 6.0/11 0.55 +38 +3.45 Group 2 6 KITTY 2410->2348 5.0/11 0.45 +36 +3.27 7 FLIPPER - ->2280 4.5/10 0.45 +48 +4.80 8 YINGYANG 2148->2154 3.5/10 0.35 -18 -1.80 9 ECLIPSE 2565->2461 5.0/12 0.42 +118 +9.83 Group 3 10 MROTH 1852->1944 4.0/12 0.33 -330 -27.50 11 REVFW - ->1899 0.0/12 0.00 -322 -26.83 All game transcripts can be obtained via e-mail using IOS command "mail TOUR/PBIII.gam". Authors' impressions & excuses ;) ================================= Fussen Alvaro [MROTH] (afussen@iiic.ethz.ch): Unfortunately, I couldn't watch the whole tournament, and was therefore a little bit disappointed to hear from Ralf, that my program was only at the 10th place. But if I look at all those strong programs, I think it was even a success to win 4 games. I think its important to say, that my program only wants to win. It doesn't maximize the disc difference in the endgame, after it has detected a win. And if it is in a losing position, it doesn't minimize the disc difference. In my opinion, a loss is a loss, it doesn't depend whether you lose with -2 or -32. I hope that explains the average disc difference of -27.5, or the close win against REVFW. And of course there is another reason for that disappointing statistic: I had to participate with an old version of my program, because I had troubles with the new one. (It isn't very clever to try to finish a new program the evening before the tournament begins. And it is extremely depressing to lose by 64-0 against SCORPION [=6-ply LOG /mic] at that evening.) Well, and then, when the tournament started (I had to play against BRUTUS) I discovered that my program was playing in a version with a bug in the endgame solver and a bug in the hash tables. So I had to disable these important features. I'd like to thank the programmer of BRUTUS for his patience. BRUTUS actually played against 3 different versions of my program :-) I'm looking forward to the next tournament, and I hope, my program will play less laughable by then. Mark Brockington [KEYANO] (brock@cs.ualberta.ca): Despite the fact that KEYANO looks like it is on a fearsome machine, the algorithm being used did not utilize the full potential of the machine. In some cases, I would've been better off just using one processor instead of all eight! At the best of times, KEYANO was thinking about a ply further ahead than it would have by simply using one processor, and I am currently fixing these problems for the next tournament! The parallel version of KEYANO had a bug-filled first tournament, but that is to be expected. Nobody said writing parallel real-time applications was easy! Mark's three most memorable games: -- YINGYANG vs KEYANO [see below /mic] was the first game where I discovered an algorithmic "feature" of KEYANO's parallel algorithm. KEYANO "wisely" played a 4-ply sequential search result when the 7-ply parallel result wouldn't come back (for reasons too complicated to explain here). So, instead of playing the superior 39.a4, it played 39.a2 and changed a drawn endgame to a losing endgame. However, YINGYANG couldn't find the winning move (g4) at 19 empty, and KEYANO salvaged a half-point out of a game which KEYANO should have lost. -- A B C D E F G H 1 |50|58|17|18|14|19|54|52| 1 2 |41|43|23|10|11|16|28|32| 2 3 |51|38| 7| 9| 2|15|13|45| 3 4 |30|34| 1|()|##|12|20|25| 4 LOGISTELLO:KEYANO 5 |35|29| 6|##|()| 5|27|46| 5 33 31 6 |31|37| 8|21| 4| 3|49|47| 6 7 |36|44|22|26|33|24|59|48| 7 8 |53|55|56|40|39|42|57|60| 8 A B C D E F G H It's as close as anyone got to defeating LOGISTELLO in this tournament. Next time, Michael ... (funny, I've been saying that for the last two years!) ;] -- YINGYANG vs ECLIPSE [see below /mic]: ECLIPSE played up to move 40 out of opening book, and then subsequently solved for a loss. "What's wrong with this picture?" Michael Buro [LOGISTELLO] (buro@uni-paderborn.de) This year Mark suggested to announce the tournament mode *before* the tournament started :) But this was not LOG's disadvantage since my tournament program robin - of course - chose the right colours for LOG ;) Almost all td-work was done by robin which determined the pairings and printed statistics. All I had to do was to copy & paste the game transcripts sent from IOS and to start robin from time to time to update the tournament IOS help-files - that was an easy job. Igor and I - equipped with chips, fruits, nuts and juice - were sitting together watching the games, chatting, and having fun. There were several surprising games which invited comments. Unfortunately, Michael Giles did not watch the tournament. So he missed the best ones including David Summers' - ZECLIPSE co-author - comment on an ECLIPSE remark: eclipse! Whenever you think you are winning a rat race -- there comes a faster rat. zardoz! Don't worry E, I have rat poison. which got big applause. As always - since he discovered the "tell-^h" trick which enables to generate IOS messages of any kind - Igor looked for victims and found Mark who could not laugh about the IOS messages " [keyano timed-out]" and " [keyano timed-out again]" which Igor sent during the critical part of a KEYANO game versus BRUTUS. Unfortunately, we missed the chance to apply the trick to both Mark and his supervisor Jonathan Schaeffer who logged in to watch the KEYANO vs LOG game. Imagine Mark's face after messages like "jonathan: Hey Mark, I've never seen such a weak parallel Othello program!" :) (Pardon Mark, but you know the sense of humor IOS people have). For LOG this was one of the most successful tournaments it ever played. I expected the tournament to be close because my Ph.D. thesis - which reveals almost all of LOG's secrets - has been available since October 1994*, and ECLIPSE and KEYANO recently have shown strong performance. This year LOG has been slightly improved by introducing 10-disc patterns and a new best-first oriented outcome-search which allows to find existing drawing/winning moves in close positions more quickly. Furthermore, in this tournament a more robust book-play technique was used in order to avoid following win-paths in which the opponent has a good deviation. Here are two interesting LOG tournament games: "Edges vs mobility" A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H 1 |55|57|40|38|36|28|59|50| 1 1 | | | | | |()| | | 1 2 |54|58|39|37|29|27|51|49| 2 2 | | | | |##|()| | | 2 3 |47|34| 3| 5|12|14|42|30| 3 3 | | |##|##|##|##| |()| 3 4 |46|43| 4|()|##| 2|11|31| 4 4 | | |##|##|()|()|()| | 4 5 |48|26|15|##|()| 9|17|21| 5 5 | |()|()|()|()|()|##|##| 5 6 |45|44|16| 6| 1| 7|10|20| 6 6 | | |()|##|##|()|##|##| 6 7 |60|52|13|19| 8|23|33|25| 7 7 | | |()|()|()|()| |##| 7 8 |53|56|18|41|22|24|35|32| 8 8 | | |()| |()|()| | | 8 A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H LOGISTELLO:BRUTUS Black to move 44 20 LOG felt fine in the opening and managed to win by corner sacrifices initiated by h4 in the diagram position. After the h8 reply, LOG was able to play the quiet moves g7, g8, and d8 thereby forcing BRUTUS to destroy its position. "Double Stoner" A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H 1 |48|12|11|10|41|27|42|60| 1 1 | |()|()|()| |##| | | 1 2 |29|45|14| 5| 8|37|59|57| 2 2 |##| |()|()|()|##| | | 2 3 |28| 7| 2| 1| 4| 9|38|54| 3 3 |##|##|()|()|()|()|()| | 3 4 |23|17| 3|()|##|21|36|55| 4 4 |##|()|##|()|()|()|()| | 4 5 |47|18| 6|##|()|20|46|58| 5 5 | |##|##|##|()|##| | | 5 6 |30|15|19|13|16|22|31|32| 6 6 |()|()|##|()|()|##|()|()| 6 7 |51|40|33|25|24|49|35|56| 7 7 | | |()|##|()| |##| | 7 8 |43|44|26|34|39|53|52|50| 8 8 | | |()|()|##| | | | 8 A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H LOGISTELLO:WIGALD White to move 34 30 In this game, LOG thought itself far ahead in late mid-game and made the game even more tactical by playing the winning move 35.g7. The diagram shows a remarkable position where both sides seem to have the chance to set up a Stoner trap due to edge and diagonal symmetry. But both X-square moves are poisoned: WIGALD's move b7 was met by e1! which simultaneously attacks a1 and a8. Analogously, Black's g2 can be met by a5. *) ftp.uni-paderborn.de/unix/othello/ps-files/ mics_dis.ps.gz (in German) probcut.ps.gz forward-pruning combi.ps.gz statistical feature combination Igor Durdanovic [KITTY] (igor@uni-paderborn.de): Eh, no any impressions this time. KITTY played just for fun .. and played stupidly; thanks to new coefficients and new book; somewhere the second day I switched to old stuff :-) Michael wanted some "Kanonenfutter" for his LOG :-) so poor old KITTY had to run after big nasty rats (the only tasty mouse was REVFW) which bit her ... though the losses were relatively small. After all it didn't play that bad :-) thanks to ECLIPSE which played even worse :-) Alexander Frenkel & Frank Weinreis [REVFW] (100705.1010@compuserve.com): We were new users on IOS and this was our first tournament. Although we lost every game, we had a lot of fun. We were not the worst in disc-difference and had two close games (30:34, 31:33). But a 8-ply search and a 15-ply search at the end is not enough to compete with the best in the world. Programming only in a high-level language isn't sufficient. [really? /mic] Michael Giles [ECLIPSE] (mgiles@revjake.gmr.com): Late Friday, after preparing ECLIPSE's book for the tournament, a bug which had been hiding in the code for 2 months popped up. I had gutted the move generator, and a line was out of place which counted the discs too soon as a result. This caused games with an odd number of passes to have the wrong sign! So, for these games the book would prefer to follow losses. On the way home from work Friday night I figured out a quick fix to the problem, by merging the games with an older version of my book utility. I drove in early Saturday am, fixed the book, but forgot to disable the add-game in the tournament version of ECLIPSE (at that point I hadn't located the bug, but I knew what the problem was). This caused ECLIPSE to avoid the normal perpendicular line for white in the game vs KITTY. I did manage to disable the add-game Saturday night. However, even fixing this bug could not help ECLIPSE in this tournament. YINGYANG managed to find a major weakness in E's book where it somehow had a "promising" alternative to a lost game except that the alternative was at a lost position! ECLIPSE also lost a won game versus BRUTUS due to its inability to solve at the crucial point. In several other games E thought it was way ahead but managed to lose. These games show that ECLIPSE has a real weakness in the late midgame. Previously, mic had dubbed ECLIPSE a "late-midgame patzer". Against LOGISTELLO, that was not suprising. Apparently he was more correct than we would have wished! Here is the summary of our lost games. For late blunder positions, high points in the eval for the game are given. Round 1: YY vs E E followed a freak high eval until the end. Round 2: E vs FLIPPER Late blunder? 27.d7 +5.61 Round 5: KITTY vs E Stupid book line from add-game bug. Round 6: E vs LOG Nice book win for LOG. Round 7: WIGALD vs E Late blunder? 34.h5 +3.91 Round 8: E vs KEYANO Late blunder? 29.a6 +7.33 37.b7 +3.54 Round 9: E vs BRUTUS Late blunder? 35.b6 +11.13 !! How could we lose? [transcripts can be obtained via e-mail, see above /mic] Well, maybe there's a Waterloo this year. I expect I'll have some time finally to do a few more changes before then. Vince A. Sempronio [YINGYANG] (vinces@access.digex.net): Year of the Hardware. YINGYANG has been around about 1 1/2 years and was written to run on a the 386/486/P5 family of PC's. From the tournaments hardware list I notice that YINGYANG was running on the second slowest computer. It did make a difference at times. One example is the tie against KEYANO. On faster hardware it wouldn't have had any trouble finding the win when it needed to. There were also a few times in mid-game situations where YY just didn't have time to find the better move and had to settle for 2nd best. At this level of play, 2nd best moves are losing moves. So what are our choices? Rewrite the code to run on a faster machine or get a faster PC. There are 133MHz/P5 systems now available which are about 3 times faster than a 486/66. This would at least put YY's hardware level at the speed as most of it's opponents. I was actually happy with YY's results since it had played most of it's opponents many times before and I had a good idea what to expect. I was surprised by Chuck Simmons' entry FLIPPER, it played some good games for its first time out. In the games against LOG, I thought things were really going to turn out bad after YY made an X-square move in mid-game but was surprised when it held on for a loss by only 6. It would be nice to see more new faces, but it isn't easy for some of the players to afford the online fees. I look forward to our next tournament. This game was interesting: A B C D E F G H 1 |32|33|20|22|23|24|26|35| 1 2 |31|36| 9|11|19|25|34|41| 2 3 |14| 8| 3| 4|10|16|43|46| 3 4 |30|13| 5|()|##| 6|15|51| 4 YINGYANG:ECLIPSE 5 |21|27| 7|##|()| 1|42|45| 5 35 29 6 |28|29|12| 2|17|50|40|52| 6 7 |38|39|47|37|44|18|59|55| 7 8 |54|57|56|49|48|53|58|60| 8 A B C D E F G H Both sides played book till move 11 where due to transpositions YY was force out of book. Again on move 13 for YY. But after that, YY transposed to a winning line and both sides played book till move 41 where E's move at 40 forced YY to think. It had enough time to solve the game as a win for YY. Interestingly enough, the winning line was also +6 so the E move at move 40 didn't help E's position. Maybe the game with least amount of clock used. Another interesting game: A B C D E F G H 1 |44|53|18|37|38|49|60|59| 1 2 |39|33|16|17|27|32|45|56| 2 3 |28|30|22| 5|14|35|31|36| 3 4 |40|25|11|()|##| 4|58|47| 4 YINGYANG:KEYANO 5 |41|10| 3|##|()| 1|29|48| 5 32 32 6 |43|24|13| 2| 7| 6|23|46| 6 7 |42|34|20| 8|12| 9|52|57| 7 8 |50|51|21|15|26|19|54|55| 8 A B C D E F G H Very close game, in fact so close that both side had a tough time solving. YY found a win at move 40 but ran out of time finding it at 42 and settled for a draw. KEYANO played out of book till move 33. Chuck Simmons [FLIPPER] (csimmons@oracle.com): Michael, "... I expected the tournament to be close because my Ph.D. thesis - which reveals almost all of LOG's secrets - has been available since October 1994 ... " Thanks for making this available on the net. But... you wouldn't happen to have an English language summary lying around, would you? I think I more or less understand what you are doing from looking at some of the pictures. I'm using a somewhat similar approach, but with interesting differences. (I'd like to blame my poor tournament showing on a design flaw in my opening book, and relatively shallow searching: 10-12 ply in the mid-game, solve at 21 empty.) I have a database of 300,000 more or less random, reachable board positions with between 8 and 18 empty squares. Each of these positions have been "solved". Given a pattern, for each of my solved boards I extract the boards' values for that pattern, and accumulate these values in a table, and then I take the average value. I think I more or less evaluate the desirability of a pattern in the same way you do. I take, say, 1,000 of my solved boards and sort them. I then evaluate each board based on the above table. Then, I count the number of board pairs which the evaluator sorted in the correct order, and where the true values of the boards are not equal. This can be converted into an accuracy rate or error rate similar to what you compute. I'm currently using two patterns combined with a mobility feature. (Mobility estimates are based on the same technology as the pattern estimates; we assume that the value of a mobility feature on a random board is equal to the average value of that mobility feature in our 300,000 solved boards). One pattern is 8 in a corner in the following pattern: xxx..... xxx..... xx...... ........ etc This has an error rate on the order of 26% (if I remember correctly). The other pattern is 8 squares along an edge. I seem to like this a lot better than you do, it has an error rate on the order of 28%. When combining these two patterns with mobility, I can get the error rate down to around 16%. Adding additional patterns doesn't seem to help much, but I haven't sufficiently tested that hypothesis. Preliminary indications suggest that certain 10-square patterns will bring the error rate down to 14% or so. But, of course, with a "small" fixed number of solved boards, there is an inherent bias in my approach. I need to increase the number of solved boards up to about 3,000,000. (If I randomly hash boards across 3^10 buckets, the error rate is about 25%. With a larger sample size, the error rate would increase to 50%.) I would be interesting in hearing more about what kinds of performance others (like you) are achieving for mid-game searches and for solving the endgame. My belief is that BRUTUS is doing 13 to 15 ply mid-game searches (without pruning). I recently did some work in that area and got wonderful speed ups, but I still think I'll be doing 12 to 14 ply searches; so I'm wondering if others are really running 2 to 3 times faster, and if so, how? For the endgame, LOGISTELLO, KEYANO, and BRUTUS all had a fairly detailed prediction of the game outcome around 24 or 25 empty. It takes me about 1,000 seconds to solve an average position with 23 empty squares. So, again, I'm wondering if I'm overlooking some really cool trick (other than pruning the tree). All game transcripts: --------------------- Part 1 ------- 1. MrOth 2. Brutus 3. yingyang 4. csimmons 5. frenkel 6. Bugs 7. kitty 8. logtest 9. Wigald 10. eclipse 11. keyano % round 1: -------- rated GAME: yingyang ( 25 0 120) vs. eclipse ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |32|33|20|22|23|24|26|35| 1 2 |31|36| 9|11|19|25|34|41| 2 3 |14| 8| 3| 4|10|16|43|46| 3 4 |30|13| 5|()|##| 6|15|51| 4 5 |21|27| 7|##|()| 1|42|45| 5 6 |28|29|12| 2|17|50|40|52| 6 7 |38|39|47|37|44|18|59|55| 7 8 |54|57|56|49|48|53|58|60| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 35:29 rated GAME: csimmons ( 25 0 120) vs. Wigald ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |60|57|38|37|21|36|53|54| 1 2 |25|58|39| 5| 8|20|56|55| 2 3 |22|26| 2| 1| 4|18|41|46| 3 4 |24| 7| 3|()|##|15|27|40| 4 5 |23|10| 6|##|()|17|42|45| 5 6 |13|16| 9|11|12|31|43|44| 6 7 |50|52|35|14|19|30|59|47| 7 8 |51|34|33|29|32|28|49|48| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 26:38 rated GAME: Brutus ( 25 0 120) vs. keyano ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |53|48|50|45|44|41|52|47| 1 2 |54|42|29|23|28|49|51|40| 2 3 |39|30| 3| 4|25| 8|38|37| 3 4 |27|26| 5|()|##| 6|34|33| 4 5 |35|24|12|##|()| 1|14|36| 5 6 |58|13|15| 2| 9| 7|19|46| 6 7 |57|55|20|16|10|11|59|43| 7 8 |56|22|21|18|31|17|32|60| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 28:36 rated GAME: frenkel ( 25 0 120) vs. logtest ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |54|60|13|21|59|39|52|55| 1 2 |56|53|12|18|24|41|51|37| 2 3 |46|17| 7| 1| 6| 8|29|36| 3 4 |47|10| 9|()|##|15|20|31| 4 5 |23|16| 2|##|()| 4|30|32| 5 6 |19|25|11|14| 5| 3|26|33| 6 7 |48|49|22|38|28|34|45|57| 7 8 |50|44|27|43|40|35|42|58| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 13:51 rated GAME: Bugs ( 25 0 120) vs. kitty ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |55|58|45|44|48|33|49|43| 1 2 |52|51|31|26|27|32|40|30| 2 3 |34|13|17| 9| 2| 7|29|20| 3 4 |25|10| 1|()|##|14|19|21| 4 5 |35|37| 8|##|()| 5|23|22| 5 6 |36|39|38|11| 4| 3| 6|28| 6 7 |42|57|50|41|12|16|54|47| 7 8 |56|53|46|24|15|18|59|60| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 33:31 round 2: -------- rated GAME: Wigald ( 25 0 120) vs. frenkel ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |46|47|14|27|28|31|32|49| 1 2 |16|45|11|35| 8|36|60|59| 2 3 |15|10| 3| 5|18|25|44|38| 3 4 |12| 9| 4|()|##| 2|19|43| 4 5 |34|29|24|##|()|13|20|48| 5 6 |39|41|17| 6| 1| 7|21|58| 6 7 |40|50|22|23|30|33|55|54| 7 8 |53|52|51|26|37|42|56|57| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 47:17 rated GAME: logtest ( 25 0 120) vs. Bugs ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |54|12|11|10|31|32|49|50| 1 2 |55|43|14| 5| 8|23|51|39| 2 3 |53| 7| 2| 1| 4| 9|38|36| 3 4 |52|19| 3|()|##|22|26|35| 4 5 |25|24| 6|##|()|18|21|46| 5 6 |42|15|16|13|20|17|37|45| 6 7 |59|58|29|28|33|27|41|44| 7 8 |60|57|30|56|34|40|48|47| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 35:29 rated GAME: keyano ( 25 0 120) vs. yingyang ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |44|53|18|37|38|49|60|59| 1 2 |39|33|16|17|27|32|45|56| 2 3 |28|30|22| 5|14|35|31|36| 3 4 |40|25|11|()|##| 4|58|47| 4 5 |41|10| 3|##|()| 1|29|48| 5 6 |43|24|13| 2| 7| 6|23|46| 6 7 |42|34|20| 8|12| 9|52|57| 7 8 |50|51|21|15|26|19|54|55| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 32:32 rated GAME: MrOth ( 25 0 120) vs. Brutus ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |57|26|25|18|28|31|32|54| 1 2 |56|40|17|16|29|27|55|39| 2 3 |21| 4|11|13|12|14|20|42| 3 4 |53| 5| 3|()|##| 6|15|24| 4 5 |52|34| 7|##|()| 1| 9|23| 5 6 |35|36|19| 2|10| 8|30|22| 6 7 |37|58|33|49|45|50|46|43| 7 8 |44|41|38|60|59|47|51|48| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 15:49 rated GAME: eclipse ( 25 0 120) vs. csimmons ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |31|58|39|38|25|34|55|40| 1 2 |32|26|13|24|49|33|35|42| 2 3 |19|12| 2| 3|20|14|36|37| 3 4 |21|10| 1|()|##|15|52|44| 4 5 |16| 9| 4|##|()|18|43|51| 5 6 |17|11| 7| 5| 6|41|57|56| 6 7 |60|48|22|27| 8|47|50|54| 7 8 |59|28|29|23|30|45|46|53| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 27:37 round 3: -------- rated GAME: Bugs ( 25 0 120) vs. Wigald ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |60|57|38|55|33|35|50|51| 1 2 |59|58|56|31|30|32|52|26| 2 3 |41|27|34| 1| 6|17|25|24| 3 4 |29|28|16|()|##|10|15|45| 4 5 |36|40| 2|##|()| 4|11|47| 5 6 |37|39|12| 7| 5| 3| 9|18| 6 7 |54|48|42|14|13| 8|43|46| 7 8 |49|53|19|20|21|22|23|44| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 34:30 rated GAME: yingyang ( 25 0 120) vs. MrOth ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |60|59|20|24|25|26|28|50| 1 2 |23|58| 9|11|19|27|51|49| 2 3 |14| 8| 3| 4|10|16|34|47| 3 4 |22|13| 5|()|##| 6|15|48| 4 5 |21|29| 7|##|()| 1|38|36| 5 6 |30|32|12| 2|17|43|52|55| 6 7 |31|46|37|35|33|18|56|57| 7 8 |53|54|44|45|40|41|39|42| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 30:34 rated GAME: kitty ( 25 0 120) vs. logtest ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |55|58|52|53|56|25|60|41| 1 2 |54|51|57|59|16|21|38|26| 2 3 |31|28|29| 1| 6|13|14|15| 3 4 |32|30| 7|()|##|10| 9|24| 4 5 |36|23| 2|##|()| 4|11|19| 5 6 |35|39|20|17| 5| 3|22|18| 6 7 |48|46|40|42|12| 8|27|43| 7 8 |47|45|37|34|33|50|49|44| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 28:36 rated GAME: frenkel ( 25 0 120) vs. eclipse ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |39|47| 9|20|10|21|56|55| 1 2 |49|36| 8| 5|16|18|54|57| 2 3 |15|14| 2| 1| 4|17|48|38| 3 4 |11| 6| 3|()|##|19|30|31| 4 5 |22| 7|25|##|()|13|26|34| 5 6 |23|24|29|12|37|28|43|27| 6 7 |60|58|32|41|35|42|46|40| 7 8 |59|52|33|44|51|45|50|53| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 14:50 rated GAME: csimmons ( 25 0 120) vs. keyano ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |49|51|26|15|25|24|53|54| 1 2 |36|46|11| 6|19|48|50|42| 2 3 |35|12| 7| 1| 8|20|38|39| 3 4 |32|27| 9|()|##|18|23|40| 4 5 |29|13| 2|##|()|16|41|60| 5 6 |28|34|14|10| 3|17|55|59| 6 7 |45|47|31|21| 5| 4|57|58| 7 8 |44|37|33|30|22|52|43|56| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 30:34 round 4: -------- rated GAME: Wigald ( 25 0 120) vs. kitty ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |53|43|30|31|27|32|41|51| 1 2 |52|54|36|19|18|24|48|60| 2 3 |47|38| 3| 4|15|11|22|39| 3 4 |33|20| 5|()|##| 6|23|28| 4 5 |44|46|10|##|()| 1| 8|17| 5 6 |45|49|21| 2| 9| 7|14|26| 6 7 |56|55|50|25|13|12|37|59| 7 8 |57|58|34|35|29|16|42|40| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 34:30 rated GAME: Brutus ( 25 0 120) vs. yingyang ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |50|51|30|29|26|25|36|53| 1 2 |46|49|23|24|20|19|40|48| 2 3 |44|45| 3| 5|18|13|14|15| 3 4 |41|43| 4|()|##| 2|16|17| 4 5 |42|28|21|##|()| 9|10|27| 5 6 |52|22| 8| 6| 1| 7|11|56| 6 7 |47|55|37|34|12|31|59|57| 7 8 |54|58|35|33|38|32|39|60| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 34:30 rated GAME: eclipse ( 25 0 120) vs. Bugs ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |50|35|31|30|32|33|47|48| 1 2 |52|51|34|23|19| 9|44|49| 2 3 |53| 8| 2| 3| 6|10|42|45| 3 4 |18| 5| 1|()|##|15|37|40| 4 5 |26|22| 4|##|()|13|36|46| 5 6 |25|21| 7|11|12|14|60|41| 6 7 |39|29|17|16|20|57|56|54| 7 8 |38|43|24|27|28|59|58|55| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 38:26 rated GAME: keyano ( 15 0 120) vs. frenkel ( 15 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |52|57|47|56|55|60|58|59| 1 2 |45|53|54|46|49|50|51|18| 2 3 |37|32| 8| 5| 6|12|17|16| 3 4 |44|34|11|()|##| 4| 7|15| 4 5 |38|35| 3|##|()| 1|13|14| 5 6 |40|31|33| 2| 9|10|20|36| 6 7 |48|41|28|25|21|19|29|23| 7 8 |42|43|26|27|24|22|39|30| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 48:16 rated GAME: MrOth ( 25 0 120) vs. csimmons ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |44|41|36|35|30|40|39|54| 1 2 |50|42|38|27|29|34|53|32| 2 3 |45|43|25|24|21|22|33|31| 3 4 |48|37|23|()|##|12|15|20| 4 5 |47|13|28|##|()| 1|10|17| 5 6 |51|46| 8| 4| 3| 2|19|18| 6 7 |57|58| 7|11| 5| 9|49|26| 7 8 | |59|56|55|14| 6|16|52| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 11:53 round 5: -------- rated GAME: kitty ( 25 0 120) vs. eclipse ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |44|52|21|60|25|12|38|46| 1 2 |59|37|23| 8|19|11|43|47| 2 3 |28|27| 5| 1| 4| 6|15|33| 3 4 |55|10| 9|()|##|18|24|29| 4 5 |48|14| 2|##|()| 7|26|30| 5 6 |53|45|20|13|22| 3|32|31| 6 7 |54|56|36|17|16|34|39|42| 7 8 |57|58|51|50|49|35|40|41| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 37:27 rated GAME: logtest ( 25 0 120) vs. Wigald ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |48|12|11|10|41|27|42|60| 1 2 |29|45|14| 5| 8|37|59|57| 2 3 |28| 7| 2| 1| 4| 9|38|54| 3 4 |23|17| 3|()|##|21|36|55| 4 5 |47|18| 6|##|()|20|46|58| 5 6 |30|15|19|13|16|22|31|32| 6 7 |51|40|33|25|24|49|35|56| 7 8 |43|44|26|34|39|53|52|50| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 34:30 rated GAME: Bugs ( 25 0 120) vs. keyano ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |51|52|28|19|32|16|30|53| 1 2 |49|50|13|11|14|15|56|26| 2 3 |48|17|12|10| 2| 9|18|25| 3 4 |46|29| 1|()|##| 7|23|24| 4 5 |47|31| 6|##|()| 5| 8|43| 5 6 |60|21|22|33| 4| 3|34|27| 6 7 |58|59|36|37|20|39|45|44| 7 8 |57|42|41|40|35|38|55|54| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 32:32 rated GAME: frenkel ( 25 0 120) vs. MrOth ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |47|40|37|22|41|42|45|44| 1 2 |50|49|48| 5|14|20|46|43| 2 3 |13|12| 2| 1| 4|19|31|36| 3 4 |11| 6| 3|()|##|21|26|27| 4 5 |38| 7| 8|##|()|30|24|35| 5 6 |39|15|10| 9|28|25|32|34| 6 7 |59|56|18|16|17|33|58|57| 7 8 |60|55|23|29|54|51|52|53| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 30:34 rated GAME: csimmons ( 25 0 120) vs. Brutus ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |36|37|16|40|39|24|52|50| 1 2 |25|29|11| 8|17|30|45|53| 2 3 |22|12| 7| 1| 6|33|35|51| 3 4 |21|14| 9|()|##|41|34|43| 4 5 |18|13| 2|##|()|38|42|44| 5 6 |19|20|27|10| 3|49|48|47| 6 7 |46|60|23|15| 5| 4|54|57| 7 8 |59|58|28|32|31|26|55|56| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 29:35 round 6: -------- rated GAME: eclipse ( 25 0 120) vs. logtest ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |58|60|44|40|28|52|29|48| 1 2 |59|53|30|33|26|27|31|49| 2 3 |46|43|32|13| 2|11|18|16| 3 4 |34|45| 1|()|##| 7|14|15| 4 5 |56|22| 6|##|()| 5|10|19| 5 6 |25|21|24|23| 4| 3| 8|17| 6 7 |54|47|35|39|12| 9|57|20| 7 8 |50|51|36|41|38|37|42|55| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 28:36 rated GAME: MrOth ( 25 0 120) vs. Bugs ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |56|54|17|21|33|36|37|47| 1 2 |55|51| 8|13|14|34|42|60| 2 3 |30| 9| 3| 5| 7|12|31|39| 3 4 |27|11| 4|()|##| 2|32|38| 4 5 |24|15|10|##|()|16|40|35| 5 6 |28|20|18| 6| 1|26|43|41| 6 7 |45|52|29|22|19|25|53|59| 7 8 |46|48|50|23|49|44|57|58| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 17:47 rated GAME: Brutus ( 25 0 120) vs. frenkel ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |53|54|24|18|29|30|55|48| 1 2 |20|52|23|15|14|27|49|37| 2 3 |19|51| 3| 4|13|11|28|35| 3 4 |10| 9| 5|()|##| 6|26|46| 4 5 |22| 8|17|##|()| 1|16|47| 5 6 |36|21|34| 2|12| 7|44|31| 6 7 |58|59|60|33|25|39|38|42| 7 8 |57|56|43|50|32|45|40|41| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 48:16 rated GAME: keyano ( 25 0 120) vs. kitty ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 | |49|40|34|38|29|46|39| 1 2 |51|59|42|35|17|20|24|26| 2 3 |52|37| 5|27| 7|14|19|18| 3 4 |44|41|22|()|##| 4|13|30| 4 5 |48|47|28|##|()| 1|33|21| 5 6 |50|45|16| 8| 3| 2|25|36| 6 7 |53|54|15| 6| 9|32|57|43| 7 8 |55|56|11|12|23|10|31|58| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 38:26 rated GAME: Wigald ( 25 0 120) vs. eclipse ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |56|51|46|44|45|37|48|49| 1 2 |55|57|47|27|13|24|38|50| 2 3 |52|54| 3| 4|23| 8|32|28| 3 4 |53|35| 5|()|##| 6|25|33| 4 5 |31|29|22|##|()| 1|17|34| 5 6 |36|30|11| 2| 9| 7|12|18| 6 7 |58|60|16|14|10|15|41|43| 7 8 |59|40|21|20|19|39|26|42| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 34:30 round 8: -------- rated GAME: yingyang ( 25 0 120) vs. csimmons ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |59|57|51|52|40|46|53|55| 1 2 |60|58|24|32|31|17|54|56| 2 3 |45|47|25|13| 8|22|21|27| 3 4 |48|34|15|()|##|11|23|26| 4 5 |38|18| 7|##|()| 1|12|28| 5 6 |33|41|14| 4| 3| 2|10|29| 6 7 |43|39|37|16| 5| 9|44|50| 7 8 |42|36|35|20|19| 6|30|49| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 27:37 rated GAME: logtest ( 25 0 120) vs. keyano ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |50|58|17|18|14|19|54|52| 1 2 |41|43|23|10|11|16|28|32| 2 3 |51|38| 7| 9| 2|15|13|45| 3 4 |30|34| 1|()|##|12|20|25| 4 5 |35|29| 6|##|()| 5|27|46| 5 6 |31|37| 8|21| 4| 3|49|47| 6 7 |36|44|22|26|33|24|59|48| 7 8 |53|55|56|40|39|42|57|60| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 33:31 rated GAME: Bugs ( 25 0 120) vs. Brutus ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |56|28|30|23|22|26|53|52| 1 2 |57|55| 9|11|25|20|49|47| 2 3 |14| 8| 3| 4|10|16|19|43| 3 4 |41|13| 5|()|##| 6|15|44| 4 5 |36|21| 7|##|()| 1|38|42| 5 6 |31|24|12| 2|17|39|40|45| 6 7 |51|37|35|29|27|18|48|54| 7 8 |50|34|33|32|46|60|59|58| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 37:27 rated GAME: frenkel ( 25 0 120) vs. yingyang ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |41|59|13|58|49|27|56|55| 1 2 |52|40|12|23|24|48|53|60| 2 3 |45|39| 7| 1| 6| 8|25|29| 3 4 |42|10| 9|()|##|22|28|36| 4 5 |17|16| 2|##|()| 4|34|37| 5 6 |15|14|11|18| 5| 3|32|33| 6 7 |51|50|38|20|19|26|44|57| 7 8 |54|43|31|30|21|35|46|47| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 18:46 rated GAME: kitty ( 25 0 120) vs. MrOth ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |49|31|30|15|21|17|44|45| 1 2 |27|48|13|12|16|14|46|42| 2 3 |24|36| 7| 1| 6| 9|32|41| 3 4 |26|23|10|()|##|11|47|43| 4 5 |25|35| 2|##|()| 4|20|50| 5 6 |38|37|28|19| 5| 3|18|51| 6 7 |39|40|22|29| 8|55|57|56| 7 8 |52|53|54|34|60|33|58|59| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 53:11 round 8: -------- rated GAME: keyano ( 25 0 120) vs. Wigald ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |48|33|32|31|30|29|46|45| 1 2 |49|43|36|16|25|18|34|47| 2 3 |39|37|14| 7| 5|20|24|50| 3 4 |42|38|12|()|##| 4|11|28| 4 5 |53|41| 3|##|()| 1|13|27| 5 6 |52|35| 6| 2| 9| 8|54|26| 6 7 |44|40|21|10|17|15|55|51| 7 8 |57|58|19|22|23|59|60|56| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 25:39 rated GAME: MrOth ( 25 0 120) vs. logtest ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |58|34|26|27|28|29|30|54| 1 2 |55|57|11|10|23|31|51| | 2 3 |36|14| 7| 9| 2|32|13|59| 3 4 |15|42| 1|()|##|12|16|37| 4 5 |50|24| 6|##|()| 5|38|41| 5 6 |25|19| 8|17| 4| 3|22|40| 6 7 |49|47|18|20|39|35|44|43| 7 8 |48|56|21|33|52|53|45|46| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 7:57 rated GAME: yingyang ( 25 0 120) vs. Bugs ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |47|48|39|35|36|34|37|54| 1 2 |46|42|41|38| 8|33|53|56| 2 3 |44|29|30|12| 5|18|17|21| 3 4 |45|27| 7|()|##| 4|20|55| 4 5 |31|28|22|##|()| 1|19|52| 5 6 |57|15|10| 6| 3| 2|13|40| 6 7 |58|43|24| 9|16|11|51|49| 7 8 | |59|26|25|23|14|32|50| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 20:44 rated GAME: Brutus ( 25 0 120) vs. kitty ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |35|41|44|12|13|14|26|45| 1 2 |36|24| 8| 5| 9|15|46|30| 2 3 |19|11| 2| 1| 4| 7|21|47| 3 4 |37|16| 3|()|##|20|18|31| 4 5 |34|22|10|##|()|29|32|43| 5 6 |23|17| 6|28|27|33|49|40| 6 7 |60|58|39|25|38|42|50|54| 7 8 |59|56|55|48|51|53|52|57| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 41:23 round 9: -------- rated GAME: Wigald ( 25 0 120) vs. MrOth ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |53|52|19|14|18|15|50|44| 1 2 |54|49|16|17|13|21|43|57| 2 3 |51|22| 7| 1| 6| 8|33|36| 3 4 |55|20| 9|()|##|27|32|40| 4 5 |28|23| 2|##|()| 4|37|48| 5 6 |30|29|11|24| 5| 3|12|47| 6 7 |35|31|25|10|26|42|58|56| 7 8 |34|39|41|38|45|46|60|59| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 31:33 rated GAME: kitty ( 25 0 120) vs. yingyang ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |60|19|18|14|17|15|50|51| 1 2 |30|59|16|11|12| 9|56|58| 2 3 |28|13| 2| 1| 6|23|57|31| 3 4 |36|10| 3|()|##|24|26|39| 4 5 |35| 7| 4|##|()|27|25|38| 5 6 |20|22|21| 5|33|29|32|37| 6 7 |53|43|44| 8|34|40|52|48| 7 8 |54|55|47|46|45|41|42|49| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 35:29 rated GAME: logtest ( 25 0 120) vs. Brutus ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |55|57|40|38|36|28|59|50| 1 2 |54|58|39|37|29|27|51|49| 2 3 |47|34| 3| 5|12|14|42|30| 3 4 |46|43| 4|()|##| 2|11|31| 4 5 |48|26|15|##|()| 9|17|21| 5 6 |45|44|16| 6| 1| 7|10|20| 6 7 |60|52|13|19| 8|23|33|25| 7 8 |53|56|18|41|22|24|35|32| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 44:20 rated GAME: eclipse ( 25 0 120) vs. keyano ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |56|24|50|49|14|33|34|59| 1 2 |51|57|19|13| 8|27|60|52| 2 3 |30|32| 2| 3|16| 9|47|46| 3 4 |31|15| 1|()|##| 6|43|45| 4 5 |54|17| 4|##|()| 7|41|44| 5 6 |29|18|11| 5|21|20|42|48| 6 7 |58|37|12|10|22|23|40|55| 7 8 |38|39|36|35|26|25|28|53| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 30:34 rated GAME: Bugs ( 25 0 120) vs. csimmons ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |49|42|43|38|44|37|52|51| 1 2 |56|58|31|33|36|45|50|46| 2 3 |29|30|34|26|10|25|35|47| 3 4 |28|18|17|()|##|23|32|41| 4 5 |27|16| 9|##|()| 1|15|24| 5 6 |21|20| 7| 4| 3| 2|40|39| 6 7 |55|54|19| 8| 5|22|59|48| 7 8 |57|14|11|12|13| 6|60|53| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 32:32 round 10: --------- rated GAME: frenkel ( 25 0 120) vs. Bugs ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |45|57|13|21|20|19|55|56| 1 2 |46|44|11| 8|18|25|58|59| 2 3 |15|12| 7| 1| 6|10|28|29| 3 4 |34|39|22|()|##| 9|14|33| 4 5 |38|23| 2|##|()| 4|26|60| 5 6 |37|32|17|16| 5| 3|42|43| 6 7 |49|47|30|36|24|35|51|54| 7 8 |48|50|31|41|40|27|53|52| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 14:50 rated GAME: yingyang ( 25 0 120) vs. logtest ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |36|22|15|21|20|35|44|46| 1 2 |37|25| 9|12|29|26|45|47| 2 3 |19| 8| 3| 4|13|17|43|48| 3 4 |16|10| 5|()|##| 6|40|59| 4 5 |24|11| 7|##|()| 1|31|34| 5 6 |23|27|14| 2|18|30|28|56| 6 7 |55|42|32|39|38|33|57|51| 7 8 |54|49|41|52|53|50|60|58| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 29:35 rated GAME: Brutus ( 25 0 120) vs. Wigald ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |51|12|11|10|50|21|31|53| 1 2 |59|60|14| 5| 8|28|52|40| 2 3 |16| 7| 2| 3| 4| 9|19|43| 3 4 |48|49| 1|()|##|18|35|44| 4 5 |54|15| 6|##|()|25|34|36| 5 6 |29|20|22|13|23|17|32|45| 6 7 |55|38|30|24|26|27|41|46| 7 8 |47|56|57|39|37|33|58|42| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 41:23 rated GAME: MrOth ( 25 0 120) vs. eclipse ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |48|50|43|40|39|41|46|56| 1 2 |47|44|14|18|17|20|51|55| 2 3 |32|11| 7| 1| 6| 8|33|21| 3 4 |23|10| 9|()|##|15|16|52| 4 5 |30|24| 2|##|()| 4|37|36| 5 6 |31|35|19|12| 5| 3|42|53| 6 7 |34|59|13|22|26|29|49|45| 7 8 | |58|25|27|57|28|38|54| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 12:52 rated GAME: csimmons ( 25 0 120) vs. kitty ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |44|57|59|60|47|46|56|55| 1 2 |37|58|40|29|45|53|52|38| 2 3 |42|34|35| 1| 6|18|33|30| 3 4 |43|28| 7|()|##|19|27|25| 4 5 |41|16| 2|##|()| 4|21|26| 5 6 |20|17| 9|14| 3| 5|22|24| 6 7 |50|48|15|10|13| 8|39|54| 7 8 |49|36|12|31|11|23|32|51| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 27:37 round 11: --------- rated GAME: Wigald ( 25 0 120) vs. yingyang ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |57|56|24|29|32|33|34|58| 1 2 |54|43|20|21|13|25|53|59| 2 3 |55|41| 3| 4|15| 8|17|60| 3 4 |45|40| 5|()|##| 6|22|23| 4 5 |28|18|42|##|()| 1|14|31| 5 6 |35|19|11| 2| 9| 7|12|30| 6 7 |36|46|26|16|10|44|49|27| 7 8 |47|48|39|38|37|50|51|52| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 31:33 rated GAME: keyano ( 25 0 120) vs. MrOth ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |45|47|29|35|41|38|56|57| 1 2 |44|39|23|26|34|42|55|54| 2 3 |36|27|25|14|13| 9|40|30| 3 4 |46|43|16|()|##| 4|17|50| 4 5 |51|28|12|##|()| 1| 5|33| 5 6 |52|18|15| 8| 3| 2|10|37| 6 7 |60|59|11| 7| 6|20|58|48| 7 8 |53|22|24|31|19|21|32|49| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 58: 6 rated GAME: eclipse ( 25 0 120) vs. Brutus ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |57|40|48|39|47|46|56|51| 1 2 |37|58|18|41|43|42|50|49| 2 3 |44|28|34|17| 2|12|23|24| 3 4 |45|29| 1|()|##| 7|22|21| 4 5 |54|15| 6|##|()| 5|13|25| 5 6 |52|35|16|10| 4| 3| 8|14| 6 7 |55|38|27|19|11| 9|36|31| 7 8 |53|30|26|59|60|20|33|32| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 31:33 rated GAME: logtest ( 25 0 120) vs. csimmons ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |53|50|35|49|48|33|59|60| 1 2 |40|42|39|34|37|32|54|41| 2 3 |57|31|19|17| 8|13|30|29| 3 4 |51|28|27|()|##|11|14|58| 4 5 |56|20| 7|##|()| 3|12|36| 5 6 |52|43|16| 4| 1| 2|10|15| 6 7 |46|44|21|22| 5| 9|55|38| 7 8 |45|26|25|24|23| 6|18|47| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 46:18 rated GAME: kitty ( 25 0 120) vs. frenkel ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |53|46|43|32|44|42|49|57| 1 2 |51|48|45|31|34|29|56|59| 2 3 |33|37|24| 1| 6|25|50|60| 3 4 |41|26|22|()|##|10|30|36| 4 5 |38|23| 2|##|()| 4|11|35| 5 6 |40|19|12| 7| 5| 3| 9|18| 6 7 |39|54|21|17|13| 8|47|58| 7 8 |55|28|27|20|14|15|16|52| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 40:24 postponed: ---------- rated GAME: csimmons ( 25 0 120) vs. frenkel ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |51|48|40|41|34|37|42|53| 1 2 |24|50|43|39|25|35|57|56| 2 3 |23|16|17| 1| 6|29|38|58| 3 4 |20|19| 7|()|##|28|31|32| 4 5 |22|21| 2|##|()| 4|33|36| 5 6 |49|18| 9|14| 3| 5|45|46| 6 7 |27|44|15|10|13| 8|54|59| 7 8 |47|52|12|30|11|26|55|60| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 55: 9 Part 2: -------- # Group 1 1. logtest 10.0/10 +174 +0 8/11 2. keyano 7.0/10 +96 +0 11/11 3. Bugs 7.0/10 +88 +0 6/11 4. Brutus 7.0/10 +72 +0 2/11 % rated GAME: Brutus ( 25 0 120) vs. logtest ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |60|54|51|50|19|53|52|48| 1 2 |42|59|11|10|23|35|47|49| 2 3 |22|24| 7| 9| 2|25|46|43| 3 4 |27|20| 1|()|##|12|30|44| 4 5 |21|17| 6|##|()| 5|32|40| 5 6 |28|15| 8|13| 4| 3|31|45| 6 7 |26|55|16|14|18|29|39|41| 7 8 |56|38|33|36|37|34|57|58| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 19:45 rated GAME: keyano ( 25 0 120) vs. Bugs ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |60|45|41|38|31|33|59|48| 1 2 |58|42|30|37| 8|32|47|50| 2 3 |49|29|27|22| 5|18|17|24| 3 4 |36|39| 7|()|##| 4|23|35| 4 5 |44|28|26|##|()| 1|15|34| 5 6 |43|57|10| 6| 3| 2|19|40| 6 7 |55|52|20|11|12| 9|46|53| 7 8 |56|25|21|14|16|13|54|51| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 30:34 rated GAME: keyano ( 25 0 120) vs. logtest ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |59|49|18|44|27|52|50|55| 1 2 |58|51|42|17|47|39|56|31| 2 3 |46|41|15| 4| 7| 8|32|30| 3 4 |38|40| 3|()|##| 6|14|29| 4 5 |45|33|22|##|()| 1|11|19| 5 6 |43|26| 9| 2| 5|10|12|20| 6 7 |48|57|25|24|13|16|53|21| 7 8 |60|35|36|28|23|34|37|54| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 25:39 rated GAME: Brutus ( 25 0 120) vs. Bugs ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |56|43|47|46|41|45|52|53| 1 2 |55|54|42|22|44|48|51|33| 2 3 |23|19| 3| 4|14|30|29|32| 3 4 |36|16| 5|()|##| 6|34|17| 4 5 |37|35|12|##|()| 1| 8|20| 5 6 |38|28|13| 2| 9| 7|15|18| 6 7 |39|60|11|26|24|10|57|21| 7 8 |58|40|49|31|25|27|50|59| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 28:36 rated GAME: Bugs ( 25 0 120) vs. logtest ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 | |20|17|19|15|16|51|52| 1 2 |58|59| 8|10|14|18|35|37| 2 3 |24| 9| 3| 5| 7|11|30|53| 3 4 |33|12| 4|()|##| 2|31|50| 4 5 |34|29|21|##|()|13|41|32| 5 6 |28|25|22| 6| 1|40|36|43| 6 7 |54|47|26|23|38|42|44|48| 7 8 |55|57|56|27|39|45|49|46| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 29:35 rated GAME: keyano ( 25 0 120) vs. Brutus ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |57|58|37|47|35|44|60|50| 1 2 |52|51|32|36|30|43|56|41| 2 3 |55|45|46| 7| 5|14|12|33| 3 4 |49|34|23|()|##| 4|11|24| 4 5 |40|31| 3|##|()| 1|15|28| 5 6 |38|39| 6| 2| 9| 8|13|16| 6 7 |54|42|22|10|21|17|27|29| 7 8 |53|26|19|25|20|18|59|48| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 35:29 Part 2: ------- # Group 2 1. kitty 5.0/10 +40 +0 7/11 2. Wigald 5.0/10 +34 +0 9/11 3. csimmons 4.5/10 +48 +0 4/11 4. yingyang 3.5/10 -18 +0 3/11 % csimmons & yingyang didn't show up for the second part :( rated GAME: kitty ( 25 0 120) vs. Wigald ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |44|57|36|18|25|26|31|30| 1 2 |43|35|17|19| 7|16|29|52| 2 3 |46|34| 2| 1| 4|10|20|27| 3 4 |32|21| 3|()|##| 5|13|50| 4 5 |48|24| 6|##|()| 8|11|15| 5 6 |45|47|41|14| 9|23|28|12| 6 7 |54|49|59|42|37|22|55|60| 7 8 |56|58|51|38|39|33|40|53| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 30:34 Part 2: ------- # Group 3 1. eclipse 3.0/10 +44 +0 10/11 2. MrOth 3.0/10 -280 +0 1/11 3. frenkel 0.0/10 -298 +0 5/11 % rated GAME: MrOth ( 25 0 120) vs. frenkel ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |51|54|16|42|41|22|55|58| 1 2 |18|44| 9|11|21|43|57|59| 2 3 |17| 8| 3| 4|10|24|56|40| 3 4 |14|13| 5|()|##| 6|39|53| 4 5 |19|15| 7|##|()| 1|37|47| 5 6 |20|23|12| 2|29|35|36|38| 6 7 |26|60|27|30|25|34|45|49| 7 8 |52|33|50|32|31|28|48|46| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 33:31 # wrong colour!!! rated GAME: eclipse ( 25 0 120) vs. MrOth ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |46|39|32|35|23|45|40|49| 1 2 |58|57|20|25|22|13|48|50| 2 3 |52|53| 5| 3|12|24|18|27| 3 4 |47|31| 4|()|##| 2|19|16| 4 5 |44|26|21|##|()| 9|10|28| 5 6 |42|41| 8| 6| 1| 7|11|15| 6 7 |51|59|36|37|17|14|30|34| 7 8 |56|60|43|54|55|29|38|33| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 58:6 rated GAME: eclipse ( 25 0 120) vs. frenkel ( 25 0 120) -> ## A B C D E F G H 1 |59|55|18|12|11|10|50|53| 1 2 |58|56|17|15| 7|14|49|54| 2 3 |26|45| 2| 3| 4|16|21|32| 3 4 |46|25| 1|()|##| 5|36|40| 4 5 |60|27| 6|##|()| 8|39|51| 5 6 |28|30|19|22|13| 9|48|52| 6 7 |47|33|20|23|29|37|43|57| 7 8 |42|31|35|24|34|38|41|44| 8 A B C D E F G H ##:() - 43:21